PDA

View Full Version : Call Of Duty: World at War


sf22189
06-26-2008, 12:25 AM
Ok just saw this so I wanted to share. I figured I'd start a new thread instead of putting it in the COD4 thread. There looks to be a new COD coming out. It's official title is COD:World at War. Made by Treyarch instead of Infinity Ward, and this one will be more of a WW2 game unlike COD4.
www.callofduty.com

According to the article, Treyarch aims to "explore the darkest corners of WWII," (www.joystiq.com)

Thoughts and Opinions?

Hopefully this isn't a repost. I couldnt find anything else on this. I'll try to find some more information

DirtyD
06-26-2008, 12:43 AM
There's no way it'll be as good as Modern Warfare. Treyarch is making it instead of IW. They also made COD3 and 1 which were both pretty gay.

There's also gonna be 4 player co-op and other stuff I can't remember. There's a pretty slick trailer on XBOX live.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35412.html

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35341.html

sf22189
06-26-2008, 12:49 AM
Yea I've heard that Treyarch sucks. I think I had COD3 and I played it for 5 minutes and then stopped. I also think that the whole WW2 theme is getting played out

JerseyStrong
06-26-2008, 12:50 AM
x3, this next duty is going to suck, but the 6th one will be kick ass :thumbup:

DirtyD
06-26-2008, 01:00 AM
Yea I've heard that Treyarch sucks. I think I had COD3 and I played it for 5 minutes and then stopped. I also think that the whole WW2 theme is getting played out

It definitely is. Way too many companies are doing it over and over again.

spook4thecia
06-26-2008, 03:18 AM
Yup yup, the WWII thing has been played to death. It might be slick with next gen graphics, but seriously how many times can you shoot the Thompson, BAR, and Garand before it gets oooold. And yeah, never playd COD3 but heard it sucked ass from nearly every review I've read.

EDIT: The trailer does look quite bad ass, though.

Jeegz
06-26-2008, 03:51 AM
I think its dumb to come out with another Call Of Duty when the one they have is still number 1. Why make another game when 4 is so exspandable?

$lick Rick
06-26-2008, 07:48 AM
I think its dumb to come out with another Call Of Duty when the one they have is still number 1. Why make another game when 4 is so exspandable?

$

bizoneoeh
06-26-2008, 08:41 AM
It's being made by the same fags that made COD3, fuck that! :thumbdown



I'll be honest, COD3 single player was alright but the multi player sucked. I don't think there's no way in hell that it will be nearly as good as COD4.

trace01m
06-26-2008, 08:54 AM
While it is being made by the company that made 3, they are using a near identical format to COD4. As far as control, graphics, AI, and multi player it should be comparable, if not better that the current game, and if done right it will be a nice change of pace.

If done wrong, it will def be trash.

DirtyD
06-26-2008, 09:33 AM
It's being made by the same fags that made COD3, fuck that! :thumbdown



I'll be honest, COD3 single player was alright but the multi player sucked. I don't think there's no way in hell that it will be nearly as good as COD4.

That's true. I've beated the single player and it wasn't that bad. There were some cool things to do . I just hope this one isn't the same old M1 Garand/KAR and the thompson/MP40 BS, it gets pretty mundane using the same four guns over and over and over again.

They should've made this COD in 'Nam instead of WWII.

bizoneoeh
06-26-2008, 09:42 AM
I don't know, the trailer looks stupid to me already.......



QB9ApSJ9nJo




I mean, no airstrikes to call in or no heli support. :( Maybe we'll have artillery to call in but who knows.

DirtyD
06-26-2008, 09:44 AM
Apparently you can use perks in single player. I'm hopping onto COD4 after I make some coffee Biz if you're interested.

rey_boricua
06-26-2008, 09:45 AM
They should've made this COD in 'Nam instead of WWII.

totally agree i was thinking the same thing

bizoneoeh
06-26-2008, 09:50 AM
Apparently you can use perks in single player. I'm hopping onto COD4 after I make some coffee Biz if you're interested.

I'm stuck at my place with the kiddies. Can't get on untill after 3pm EST otherwise I'd murk your ass! :twisted:



It be kind of hard doing a good 'Nam game imo but that would be cool.

DirtyD
06-26-2008, 10:19 AM
:lol:

send me an invite when you can

sf22189
06-26-2008, 11:28 AM
They should've made this COD in 'Nam instead of WWII.

That game would never end! lol At first I thought this one had to do with a modern korea or something since Kim Jim Schlong or w.e his name is, is always shooting up rockets or somethin

$lick Rick
06-26-2008, 09:11 PM
I will not be playing this game.... i'm sick of ww2 games and the tired ass shitty guns, weapons, and abilities they entail.

cod3 sucked ass, and this isnt anything more than cod3 part deux

lilwhitecoupe
06-26-2008, 09:36 PM
gears of war 2 >>>>> new COD
I dont understand why IW didn't just make this one as well. they did a damn good job with number 4

DirtyD
06-26-2008, 10:06 PM
^^ I think it's because IW takes their time with their releases.

They started making COD4 RIGHT after they finished COD2 which was four years (I think). On the other hand, Activision are nothing but a bunch of money hungry garbage pushers.

lilwhitecoupe
06-26-2008, 10:28 PM
^ good call i didn't think about the time it took them to create and produce cod4 activision is like most major gaming companies such as EA. make a potentially good game and screw it up

sf22189
06-26-2008, 10:28 PM
IW should branch off and start a new series by themselves that will be kick ass