i need your advice!

[waseem]

i want to buy a car! i am confused between honda Civic Hatchback 1995 and Mitsubishi Colt 1995.. both mechanic transmission engine 1.6.
i am not looking for a fast car or very powerful like most of the teens, i am looking for a good car, cheap parts, almost zero troubles..
i would like to know which one is better ( mechanically ) and why?
( please be serious with the answers ) thanks in advance!

 

[civictegfan]

the hatchback for sure...what the hell is a mitsubishi colt anyway? You'll like the civic...parts galore and they are cheap and easy to fix too.

 

[waseem]

thanks, i thought so too

 

[jdm jim]

is this even a question, deff the hatch mitsu were junky.

 

[31dev31]

The mitsubishi colt is actually a baby version of the lancer evo.

But go with the civic anyways!

 

[InMaVTI]

u wont get parts for a colt that easily!...civics, theres parts/engines EVERYWHEEERE! lol.

 

[EGHseries]

Civic

 

[J_Uhrig87]

civic for sure. like everyone has said, parts are readily available, and you don't have to be a UTI graduate to replace everything on the car.

 

[ryanM]

turbo colts are ok

but just go with a civic..

 

[Wthorp]

Colt if you want a decent stock car not needing much to be done to it to be fast. They are pretty decent cars, I don't like how they handle however.

A Civic however is better when it comes to parts, pricing, and it's overall accessibiliy with parts and aftermarket items. They handle better too

 

[Dakota]

Asking if you should buy a civic in the clubcivic.com forum . Yeah , you'll get an unbiased answer here!!!! Seriously - I would recommend the civic , for all the reasons previously stated!

 

[waseem]

thanks alot guys i was thinking about the civic, i wanted to make sure.. before making a move i have to think i had a bad experience with opel calibra and fiat bravo

 

[EGHseries]

still civic